måndag 14 november 2011

the art... who decides?

Who decides your talents? I think I'm great at many things, and I bet many others think they are too. But how does one know that the talents possessed are more than just imagination? You constantly hear that the only opinion that matters is your own, which is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard, the only opinion that does NOT matter is your own!

Because; you cannot keep on doing your talent if you never get any acknowledgement from others. Part of the satisfaction of having a talent is to see other people enjoying it. (It is now when people are meant to say; a true artist does not care for acknowledgement)

So many artists have done years of struggling, before the big break. Now, is it that they are talented (or untalented) but not listened to or do you really just need the right person to tell everyone that you are worth the while?

Is a true talent not the sort of talent that is appreciated by everyone, or is it more like; the weirder it gets the better? Who will decide if a painter is good, average or just bad?  The thing about art is that you have to convey an emotion, and if you don't you are screwed. I get so irritated when people are doing art with their brain and not their soul. That is why it is so tricky, because you can choose to make art for yourself using your own emotions and hope that others will appreciate and understand it or you can use your brain and create what you know people want to see. I wonder, always, what is art and what is not? Can superficiality be an art, or does one have to be depressed in order to make a statement?

I feel that even the world of art is corrupt. 




Falseness is everywhere to be found and it is all  fucking depressing. 

Inga kommentarer:

Skicka en kommentar